In a recent piece, Taraleigh Davis evaluates the New York Times' coverage of the Supreme Court's emergency docket, shedding light on both its merits and shortcomings.
Davis emphasizes the importance of understanding how the emergency docket functions, suggesting that the Times' analysis could benefit from a more nuanced approach.
This ongoing series aims to clarify the complexities of the Supreme Court's emergency procedures, providing readers with a clearer picture of its implications.